Purposeful non-action: Human Action is irrefutable. It is axiomatically true. To disprove it, one must act and thus by definition prove that humans act.... Now, what if your proof that humans do not act is simply to engage in nothing but impulse or thus to engage in completely unconscious behavior. Would't you still, inevitable prove that humans act by "choosing" to engage in unconscious behavior? Didn't you just engage in purposeful non-action?